Jakupovic, Dalila - Avanesyan, Elina Tennis Wett-Tipps & Prognosen

Dalila Jakupovic is a 35-year-old Slovenian (WTA No. 357) while Elina Avanesyan is a 23-year-old Armenian (around WTA No. 190), creating a clear age and ranking gap in favor of the younger player. Jakupovic reached her career-high No. 69 in Nov 2018, so her peak happened years ago, whereas Avanesyan peaked at No. 36 in Mar 2025 and is closer to her prime. Short-term and season form strongly favor Avanesyan: in 2026 she has a 53,33% match win rate (16/30) versus Jakupovic’s 36,36% (4/11), and on red clay Avanesyan is 14/24 (58,33%) in 2026 while Jakupovic is 1/6 (16,67%).

Bookmakers make Elina Avanesyan a heavy favourite at 1.14 (~87,7% implied) while Dalila Jakupovic is a clear underdog at 4.80 (~20,8% implied).

📈Market Expectations vs Reality (last 60 days)

Jakupovic has lost both of her two matches as an underdog in the last 60 days (0% win rate) but won the single match where she was favourite (1/1, 100%). Avanesyan has a mixed recent record against market expectations, winning 2 of 4 matches as favourite (50%) and 1 of 2 as underdog (50%).

🏆Notable Tournament Performances

Avanesyan produced the most significant result in the last year with a semi‑final at the WTA 125 Makarska (prize pot $115,000) and she also featured in higher‑level events including WTA 250 tournaments and the US Open main draw, so she has experience on bigger stages. Jakupovic’s year consists almost entirely of WTA 125 appearances with mostly early exits and no deep runs or top‑level breakthroughs.

🔎Opponents Quality Check (last 365 days)

Jakupovic primarily faced opponents ranked outside the top 200 and posted just a 21% overall win rate, failing to beat top‑200 opponents. Avanesyan compiled a 47% overall win rate, performing well versus #101–200 (53%) and >200 (60%) but she has not beaten top‑100 opponents or recorded any top‑50 scalps in the last 12 months.

We couldn't find details about latest H2H matches between Dalila Jakupovic and Elina Avanesyan.

Jakupovic arrives with uneven recent results but shows clear uptick on indoor hard courts, where she wins more matches and converts break chances better. She has not yet played in this tournament, so her first match here will set the tone.

🏟️Tournament performance so far

Dalila Jakupovic has not yet played a match in this tournament.

Key tournament stats:

Matches played in this tournament: 0 — no match stats available

📈📉Short & long term form

Jakupovic lost seven of her last ten matches (3–7) and has a weak overall 5–11 record across the last 365 days, but form on indoor hard courts is stronger with 3 wins from 5 matches. Her service remains the more reliable part of her game — she wins roughly half of service points — while double faults are a recurring issue and ace production is low, limiting free points.

Key form stats:

Last 10: 3–7 record, service points won ~52%, double faults ~2,8 per match

Last 365 days: 5–11 record, service points won ~51%, breakpoint conversion ~46%

Indoor hard (recent): better service hold and breakpoint efficiency compared with overall form

📆Year to date form

YTD Jakupovic is 4–7 on the year across all surfaces (4 wins in 11 matches) with her best results on indoor hard courts (3 wins in 5 matches); she has not won a tournament this year. This match is played on hardcourt indoor, where she wins 56% of service points and converts breakpoints at a higher rate (58%) compared with her season averages, showing a clear surface-specific advantage.

Key YTD stats:

YTD all surfaces: 11 matches, 4 wins

YTD hardcourt indoor: 5 matches, 3 wins; service points won 56%

Breakpoint conversion: 53% overall vs 58% on hardcourt indoor

Jakupovic plays compact, attack-first tennis that shortens points behind a dependable first serve and strong breakpoint finishing; Avanesyan plays heavier, rally-based tennis that grinds from the forehand wing and pressures opponents through consistency and break chance creation. The biggest difference is Jakupovic shortens rallies and relies on serving/pressure points while Avanesyan extends rallies and looks to outlast and create breaks, which will turn the match into a contrast of short‑point aggression versus sustained consistency; Jakupovic posts a higher service points won percentage (55% vs Avanesyan’s 50% long‑term) while Avanesyan owns a superior overall points won percentage (50% vs Jakupovic’s 46%).

1️⃣ Dalila Jakupovic playstyle

Jakupovic hits compact, controlled tennis that aims to seize initiative with the first serve and finish short points rather than engage in long baseline duels. Her strengths are serving reliability and clutch finishing — she wins a high share of service points and converts break chances (breakpoint conversion ~53%) — while her vulnerability is endurance in long rallies and match consistency (points won percentage ~46% and low recent win rate), so the match outcome hinges on whether she can keep points short and cash break opportunities.

2️⃣ Elina Avanesyan playstyle

Avanesyan constructs points from the forehand, grinds through long rallies and forces opponents into extended exchanges where she creates and converts break chances. Her strengths are forehand aggression and breakpoint production (groundstroke/forehand share ~83% and breakpoint conversion ~52%), while her weaknesses are a below-average serve and a fragile second delivery that produces double faults (season double‑fault rate ~6,4% and very low ace numbers), so the match will turn on whether she can exploit Jakupovic’s backhand and service games without suffering from serve inconsistency.

Dalila Jakupovic delivers a steady, controlled serve that produces more aces (1,19) and fewer double faults (2,88) than her opponent, and her second serve holds up well with a 51,15% win rate which keeps her out of trouble on serve. Elina Avanesyan wins more first‑serve points (55,38%) and squeezes out slightly more service games, but she produces far fewer aces (0,31) and commits more double faults (4,34), which exposes her on tight return games. Jakupovic’s stability on second serve gives her an edge in extended rallies while Avanesyan’s first‑serve aggression creates quick opportunities; the match will hinge on whether Avanesyan’s errors on second serves hand Jakupovic the momentum or whether Avanesyan’s superior first‑serve point conversion lets her steal short service games.

Key service data

Avanesyan performs strongly both when ahead and under pressure: she converts a first-set lead (93,75%) and wins tight deuce battles on serve and return (52,00% / 55,00%), which gives her momentum control and resilience in close games. Jakupovic struggles when behind and under pressure: she loses the match after dropping the first set 91,67% of the time and only wins deuce points as receiver 38,00%, leaving her exposed in pivotal games and prone to being dominated. This implies Avanesyan will dictate momentum and force Jakupovic to win big early games and improve deuce returns to avoid a straight collapse.

Key data for advantge & under pressure play

Dalila Jakupovic rarely reaches tie-breaks (avg 0,19 per match) and has only converted 33,33% of them, producing 0,33 aces per tie-break and no double faults but also no recorded deuce-point wins, so her clutch record is effectively untested and the sample is very low. Elina Avanesyan reaches tie-breaks more often (avg 0,25 per match) and wins them at a 50,00% rate, she splits deuce points 1–1 (50,00%) but concedes more pressure errors with 0,29 double faults per tie-break fixture and no aces. Jakupovic’s clean serving in tie-breaks gives her a low-error profile, while Avanesyan’s better win rate and ability to win deuce points give her the edge in tight moments; this dynamic implies Avanesyan should prevail in final-set shootouts unless Jakupovic’s serving free points (aces) turn the balance.

Key tie-break data